Mandatory Sentencing Guidelines and Special Interest Groups as Policy Essay

Mandatory Sentencing Guidelines and Special Interest Groups as Policy Makers - Essay ExampleThe intent of three-strikes (and even two-strikes) laws is to incapacitate selected fiery offenders for very long terms-25 years or even life. They have no specific deterrent effect if those confined will never be released, tho their general deterrent effect could, in theory, be substantial. In this regard, mandatory sentencing guidelines appear to be good policy when it comes to deterring potential criminals from committing crimes, but that is not ineluctably the field if a criminal has already be incapacitated. It is more of a case of setting an example for others.There are pros and cons to mandatory sentencing, but they see to vary upon different factors such as location in the country. First of all, let us take a look at the possession of handguns. The case study mentions, for example, possession of unlicensed handguns in Massachusetts and how the law has been effective there. The sam e law, however, has not been effective in Michigan and Florida. However, it has bee effective against homicide in Detroit, Jacksonville, Tampa, Miami, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, though it has not been effective against other types of violent crimes, such as sexual offenses (Case Study 3.2 2008).2.